Frameworks for Distributed Training in Deep Learning
Training large deep learning models, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), often requires computational resources far beyond a single machine. Distributed training allows us to leverage multiple GPUs or even multiple machines to accelerate the training process and handle models that are too large to fit into the memory of a single device. This involves distributing the model, data, or both across various computational nodes.
Key Concepts in Distributed Training
Data Parallelism distributes data across workers, each holding a replica of the model.
In data parallelism, each worker has a full copy of the model. The training data is split into mini-batches, and each worker processes a different mini-batch. Gradients are computed locally and then aggregated (e.g., averaged) across all workers before updating the model parameters.
Data parallelism is the most common approach. It's effective when the model fits into the memory of a single device but the dataset is too large to process efficiently on one machine. The core idea is to replicate the model on each worker (e.g., GPU). Each worker receives a different subset of the training data. During the forward and backward passes, each worker computes gradients based on its local data. These gradients are then synchronized and aggregated across all workers. A common aggregation method is averaging the gradients. Finally, the aggregated gradients are used to update the model parameters on each worker, ensuring all model replicas stay synchronized. This method scales well with the number of workers, but communication overhead for gradient synchronization can become a bottleneck.
Model Parallelism splits the model across multiple workers.
Model parallelism divides a large model into smaller parts, with each worker responsible for computing a portion of the model's layers. This is crucial for models that are too large to fit into a single GPU's memory.
Model parallelism is employed when a single model is too large to fit into the memory of a single accelerator (like a GPU). The model is partitioned into stages, and each stage is assigned to a different worker. During the forward pass, data flows sequentially through the workers, with each worker performing computations for its assigned layers and passing the intermediate activations to the next worker. The backward pass follows the reverse path. This approach can be complex to implement efficiently due to the sequential dependencies and potential for idle time if the workload is not balanced. Techniques like pipeline parallelism are a form of model parallelism that aims to improve efficiency by overlapping computation and communication.
| Feature | Data Parallelism | Model Parallelism |
|---|---|---|
| Model Size | Fits on single device | Too large for single device |
| Data Distribution | Data split across workers | Model split across workers |
| Worker Responsibility | Full model computation on subset of data | Partial model computation on full data |
| Primary Bottleneck | Gradient synchronization | Inter-layer communication/dependencies |
| Use Case | Large datasets, models fit in memory | Very large models, limited memory per device |
Popular Frameworks and Libraries
Several frameworks and libraries have been developed to simplify the implementation of distributed training. These tools abstract away much of the complexity, allowing researchers and engineers to focus on model development.
Model parallelism addresses the challenge of models being too large to fit into the memory of a single accelerator.
Distributed training strategies can be visualized as different ways to partition the computational workload. Data parallelism can be thought of as multiple identical workers processing different slices of data simultaneously, like a team of chefs each preparing a different dish from the same recipe book. Model parallelism, on the other hand, is like an assembly line where each worker performs a specific step in creating a single, complex product, passing it to the next worker for the subsequent step. Hybrid approaches combine these strategies, akin to having multiple assembly lines working in parallel on different parts of a larger project.
Text-based content
Library pages focus on text content
Frameworks like PyTorch Distributed, TensorFlow Distributed, and Horovod provide high-level APIs for implementing these strategies. They handle communication protocols (like NCCL for NVIDIA GPUs or Gloo for CPU-based communication), gradient aggregation, and synchronization, making it significantly easier to scale training jobs.
Choosing the right distributed training strategy (data, model, or hybrid) depends heavily on the model size, dataset size, and available hardware. Experimentation is often key to finding the most efficient setup.
Learning Resources
A comprehensive guide to PyTorch's distributed training capabilities, covering data parallelism and model parallelism concepts.
Explains TensorFlow's strategies for distributed training, including `MirroredStrategy` and `MultiWorkerMirroredStrategy`.
Official documentation for Horovod, a distributed training framework that works with TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, and MXNet.
Learn about DeepSpeed, a deep learning optimization library that makes distributed training of huge models faster and more efficient.
Explore Megatron-LM, a project from NVIDIA for efficiently training very large transformer-based language models using model and data parallelism.
A blog post explaining the fundamental concepts of data and model parallelism with practical examples.
A video tutorial demonstrating how to implement distributed training using PyTorch's `torch.distributed` package.
An article detailing different parallelism techniques used in deep learning, including data, model, and pipeline parallelism.
A TensorFlow tutorial on how to use Horovod for distributed training on High-Performance Computing (HPC) clusters.
An explanation of pipeline parallelism from Hugging Face, a technique that overlaps computation and communication for model parallelism.