LibraryIdentifying Assumptions and Underlying Logic

Identifying Assumptions and Underlying Logic

Learn about Identifying Assumptions and Underlying Logic as part of LSAT India and International Law School Preparation

Mastering LSAT Reading Comprehension: Identifying Assumptions and Underlying Logic

The LSAT Reading Comprehension section tests your ability to understand complex arguments. A crucial skill for success is the ability to identify the unstated assumptions that form the bedrock of an author's reasoning. This module will equip you with strategies to uncover these hidden premises and understand the logical structure of arguments.

What are Assumptions?

An assumption is a statement that the author takes for granted or believes to be true, but does not explicitly state. These unstated beliefs are essential for the conclusion to logically follow from the evidence provided. Without these assumptions, the argument would fall apart.

Identifying Assumptions: Strategies

Uncovering assumptions requires careful reading and critical thinking. Here are some effective strategies:

1. Look for the Logical Leap: Pay close attention to the transition between the evidence presented and the author's conclusion. Where does the argument seem to jump from one idea to another without explicit justification?

2. The Negation Test: This is a powerful technique. Take a potential assumption and negate it (make it false). If the argument falls apart or becomes illogical when the assumption is negated, then it is likely a necessary assumption.

3. Identify What Must Be True: Ask yourself: 'What must the author believe to be true for this conclusion to be valid, given the evidence?'

4. Beware of Overstated Conclusions: If a conclusion seems too strong or broad given the evidence, there's likely an unstated assumption that allows for this generalization.

What is the primary purpose of an assumption in an argument?

To bridge the gap between the evidence (premises) and the conclusion, making the argument logically sound from the author's perspective.

Underlying Logic: The Structure of Reasoning

Understanding the underlying logic means dissecting how the author constructs their argument. This involves recognizing the type of reasoning used, the relationship between different parts of the argument, and how evidence is used to support claims.

Logical StructureDescriptionExample
Deductive ReasoningMoves from general principles to specific conclusions. If premises are true, the conclusion must be true.All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Inductive ReasoningMoves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Conclusions are probable, not certain.Every swan I have ever seen is white. Therefore, all swans are white.
Causal ReasoningEstablishes a cause-and-effect relationship between events.The company's profits increased after the new marketing campaign was launched. Therefore, the campaign caused the profit increase.
Analogical ReasoningDraws conclusions based on similarities between two different things.Just as a heart pumps blood to keep the body alive, a central processor pumps data to keep a computer functioning.

LSAT arguments often blend these types of reasoning. Identifying the dominant logical structure helps you understand how the author is trying to persuade you and where their argument might be vulnerable.

When an argument relies heavily on a specific type of reasoning (like induction or analogy), look for weaknesses inherent in that type of logic. For instance, inductive arguments can be flawed by insufficient evidence, and analogical arguments can be weak if the comparison is not apt.

Practice and Application

The key to mastering assumption identification and understanding underlying logic is consistent practice. Work through LSAT Reading Comprehension passages, actively looking for unstated premises and mapping out the argument's structure. Don't just read; analyze. Ask yourself 'why' at every step of the author's reasoning.

What is the 'negation test' and how is it used to identify assumptions?

The negation test involves making a potential assumption false. If negating the assumption causes the argument to break down, it is a necessary assumption.

Consider an argument: 'The new environmental regulations will harm businesses. Therefore, they should not be implemented.' To find the assumption, we can ask: 'What must the author believe to be true for this conclusion to follow?' The author likely assumes that economic harm to businesses is a sufficient reason to reject any regulation, regardless of other potential benefits (like environmental protection). The negation test: 'The new environmental regulations will not harm businesses.' If this is true, the argument that they 'should not be implemented' because of harm is weakened, but not necessarily destroyed. However, if we negate the assumption that 'economic harm is a sufficient reason to reject regulations,' the argument collapses. The underlying logic here is a value judgment prioritizing economic stability over environmental protection.

📚

Text-based content

Library pages focus on text content

Learning Resources

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Assumptions Explained(blog)

This blog post from PowerScore, a well-known LSAT prep company, provides a clear explanation of assumptions in LSAT Reading Comprehension and offers strategies for identifying them.

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Identifying the Core Argument(blog)

Manhattan Prep's blog offers insights into breaking down LSAT Reading Comprehension passages, focusing on how to identify the main argument and its underlying structure.

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Assumption Questions(blog)

This resource delves into the specific question types related to assumptions in LSAT Reading Comprehension, providing examples and tips for tackling them.

Logical Reasoning: Assumptions (LSAT Prep)(video)

A YouTube video from LSAT Unlocked that explains the concept of assumptions in logical reasoning, which is directly applicable to Reading Comprehension.

Understanding Logical Structure in Arguments(wikipedia)

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on Informal Logic provides a foundational understanding of argument structure, validity, and different types of reasoning.

LSAT Reading Comprehension Strategy Guide(blog)

Kaplan Test Prep offers a comprehensive strategy guide for LSAT Reading Comprehension, including sections on argument analysis and identifying unstated premises.

The LSAT Trainer: Reading Comprehension(book)

While a book, 'The LSAT Trainer' is highly regarded for its practical approach to LSAT skills, including detailed explanations and exercises for Reading Comprehension and logical reasoning.

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Assumption Questions Explained(blog)

Beat the LSAT provides a focused explanation of assumption questions, including common traps and effective methods for solving them.

Logic and Argumentation(tutorial)

This Coursera course (or similar university-level introductions) can provide a deeper understanding of logical structures, fallacies, and argumentation principles relevant to LSAT analysis.

LSAT Reading Comprehension: Identifying the Main Point(blog)

Understanding the main point is foundational to identifying assumptions. This article from The Princeton Review helps learners pinpoint the central idea of a passage.