LibraryIdentifying Common Argument Flaws

Identifying Common Argument Flaws

Learn about Identifying Common Argument Flaws as part of GMAT Preparation - Graduate Management Admission Test

Mastering Argument Flaws: Your GMAT Verbal Advantage

In GMAT Reading Comprehension and Critical Reasoning sections, identifying logical fallacies and argument flaws is paramount. These flaws weaken an argument, making it less persuasive. Recognizing them allows you to critically evaluate the author's reasoning and choose the most logically sound answer.

What is an Argument Flaw?

An argument flaw, also known as a logical fallacy, is an error in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or unsound. These flaws can be subtle, often disguised by persuasive language or incomplete evidence. On the GMAT, questions that ask you to identify an argument flaw require you to pinpoint the specific weakness in the author's logic.

Common Argument Flaws on the GMAT

Let's explore some of the most frequently tested argument flaws. Understanding their definitions and how they manifest in arguments will significantly boost your performance.

1. Ad Hominem (Attacking the Person)

2. Straw Man

3. False Dichotomy (Black-or-White Fallacy)

4. Appeal to Authority (False Authority)

5. Hasty Generalization

6. Correlation vs. Causation (Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc)

7. Circular Reasoning (Begging the Question)

8. Equivocation

Strategies for Identifying Argument Flaws

To excel at identifying argument flaws on the GMAT, employ these strategies:

1. Understand the Argument's Structure

Identify the conclusion, premises, and any assumptions the author makes. What is the author trying to prove, and what evidence do they offer?

2. Look for Weaknesses in the Evidence

Is the evidence sufficient? Is it relevant? Is it from a reliable source? Are there alternative explanations for the evidence presented?

3. Analyze the Reasoning Process

Does the conclusion logically follow from the premises? Are there leaps in logic or unsupported assumptions? This is where you'll often spot the fallacies.

4. Consider Counterarguments and Alternative Explanations

A strong argument anticipates and addresses potential objections. If the author ignores obvious counterarguments or alternative explanations, it might indicate a flaw.

5. Practice, Practice, Practice!

The more arguments you analyze, the better you'll become at spotting these flaws. Use official GMAT materials and practice questions regularly.

Think of argument flaws as 'holes' in the author's reasoning. Your job is to find these holes and explain why they weaken the argument.

Dual Coding: Visualizing Argument Flaws

Visualizing the structure of an argument and how a flaw disrupts it can be very helpful. Imagine an argument as a bridge. Premises are the pillars supporting the road (conclusion). A flaw is like a weak or missing pillar, or a section of the road that doesn't connect properly, making the bridge unsafe or unusable. For example, in a Hasty Generalization, the pillars (evidence) are too few or too weak to support the weight of the road (conclusion). In a False Dichotomy, the bridge is presented as having only two possible paths, when in reality, there are many more, and the arguer is forcing you to choose between two specific, often undesirable, ones.

📚

Text-based content

Library pages focus on text content

Active Recall: Test Your Understanding

What is the primary error in reasoning for the 'Ad Hominem' fallacy?

Attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.

If an argument presents only two options when more exist, what fallacy is likely being used?

False Dichotomy (Black-or-White Fallacy).

What is the key difference between correlation and causation?

Correlation means two things happen together; causation means one thing directly causes the other.

Putting It All Together

By understanding these common argument flaws and practicing their identification, you'll be well-equipped to dissect complex arguments on the GMAT. This skill is not only crucial for Verbal Reasoning but also enhances your critical thinking abilities in all aspects of the exam and beyond.

Learning Resources

Logical Fallacies: The Ultimate Guide(documentation)

A comprehensive and visually appealing guide to common logical fallacies, perfect for quick reference and understanding.

GMAT Critical Reasoning: Identifying Flaws(blog)

A forum discussion with GMAT experts and students detailing common flaws and strategies for identifying them in GMAT questions.

Common Logical Fallacies Explained(video)

A clear and concise video explanation of various logical fallacies with examples, aiding visual learners.

GMAT Official Guide - Verbal Review(documentation)

The official GMAT Verbal Review guide provides practice questions and explanations, including those focused on argument analysis and flaws.

Argument Structure and Fallacies(wikipedia)

A detailed academic overview of fallacies, their classification, and historical context, offering a deeper theoretical understanding.

Critical Reasoning: Flawed Logic(blog)

A blog post from a reputable GMAT prep company that breaks down how to approach flawed logic questions on the GMAT.

The Power of Logic: Argumentation and Fallacies(tutorial)

A Coursera course module that delves into the principles of argumentation and the identification of fallacies, offering structured learning.

GMAT Critical Reasoning: Identifying Assumptions(blog)

While focused on assumptions, this article indirectly helps in identifying flaws by understanding what's missing or unstated in an argument.

Fallacy Detective: Reasoning Skills for Adults(documentation)

A resource dedicated to teaching reasoning skills and identifying fallacies through practical examples and exercises.

GMAT Critical Reasoning Practice Questions(tutorial)

A collection of practice questions specifically for GMAT Critical Reasoning, allowing you to apply your knowledge of argument flaws.