Introduction to Game Theory in Behavioral Economics
Game theory is a powerful framework for understanding strategic interactions between rational decision-makers. In behavioral economics, it's used to analyze how people make choices when their outcomes depend on the decisions of others, often deviating from purely rational predictions.
What is Game Theory?
At its core, game theory studies situations where multiple players make decisions, and the outcome for each player is influenced by the choices of all other players. These situations are called 'games'.
Game theory models strategic decision-making.
It analyzes situations where outcomes depend on the choices of multiple individuals, known as players.
A 'game' in this context is any situation involving two or more decision-makers (players) whose actions affect each other. The goal is to understand the optimal strategies players can adopt, considering the potential actions of others. This often involves predicting behavior and identifying stable outcomes.
Key Concepts in Game Theory
Several fundamental concepts are crucial for understanding game theory:
Players
The decision-makers in the game. These can be individuals, firms, countries, or any entity making strategic choices.
Strategies
The set of actions a player can take in a given situation. A strategy specifies what a player will do in every possible circumstance they might encounter.
Payoffs
The outcomes or rewards (or costs) that players receive based on the combination of strategies chosen by all players. Payoffs are typically represented numerically.
Equilibrium
A stable state in a game where no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy, given the strategies of the other players. The most famous type is the Nash Equilibrium.
Strategy
Types of Games
Games can be classified in various ways, influencing how they are analyzed:
| Feature | Cooperative Games | Non-Cooperative Games |
|---|---|---|
| Binding Agreements | Players can form binding agreements. | Players cannot form binding agreements. |
| Focus | Coalition formation and payoff distribution. | Individual strategies and outcomes. |
| Example | International treaties, labor union negotiations. | Prisoner's Dilemma, Rock-Paper-Scissors. |
| Feature | Simultaneous Games | Sequential Games |
|---|---|---|
| Timing of Moves | Players make decisions at the same time. | Players make decisions in a specific order. |
| Information | Players may not know the other's move. | Players may know previous moves. |
| Example | Rock-Paper-Scissors, Prisoner's Dilemma. | Chess, Tic-Tac-Toe. |
The Prisoner's Dilemma: A Classic Example
The Prisoner's Dilemma is a foundational example illustrating the conflict between individual rationality and collective well-being. Two suspects are arrested and interrogated separately. Each can either 'cooperate' (stay silent) or 'defect' (betray the other). The payoffs are structured such that defecting is always the best individual strategy, regardless of what the other suspect does, leading to a suboptimal outcome for both if they both defect.
The Prisoner's Dilemma payoff matrix shows the outcomes for two players based on their choices to Cooperate (C) or Defect (D). The numbers represent years in prison (lower is better). If both Cooperate, they get a moderate sentence (e.g., 1 year each). If one Defects and the other Cooperates, the Defector goes free, and the Cooperator gets a severe sentence (e.g., 10 years). If both Defect, they both receive a moderate-to-high sentence (e.g., 5 years each). This structure incentivizes defection for both players, leading to the (Defect, Defect) outcome, which is worse for both than (Cooperate, Cooperate).
Text-based content
Library pages focus on text content
In the Prisoner's Dilemma, the dominant strategy for each player is to defect, even though mutual cooperation would yield a better collective outcome. This highlights the tension between self-interest and mutual benefit.
Behavioral Game Theory
Behavioral game theory extends traditional game theory by incorporating psychological insights and empirical evidence from experiments. It acknowledges that people are not always perfectly rational and may be influenced by fairness, reciprocity, social norms, and cognitive biases. Experiments are crucial for testing theoretical predictions and understanding these deviations.
Behavioral game theory incorporates psychological insights and empirical evidence, acknowledging that people are not always perfectly rational.
Applications in Behavioral Economics
Game theory is applied to understand a wide range of economic phenomena, including:
- Market competition: How firms set prices and strategies.
- Auctions: Designing efficient auction mechanisms.
- Bargaining: Negotiations between buyers and sellers.
- Public goods: Understanding contributions to shared resources.
- Social dilemmas: Analyzing cooperation and conflict in groups.
Experimental Design in Game Theory
Experiments are vital for testing game theory predictions and understanding behavioral deviations. Key elements of experimental design include:
- Incentive compatibility: Ensuring participants' payoffs align with their preferences.
- Anonymity: Protecting participants' identities to reduce social pressure.
- Repetition: Conducting games multiple times to observe learning and adaptation.
- Control: Manipulating specific variables to isolate their effects.
Anonymity helps reduce social pressure and ensures participants make decisions based on their true preferences rather than how they want to be perceived.
Learning Resources
A comprehensive philosophical overview of game theory, its history, and its foundational concepts.
Learn the basics of game theory with clear explanations and examples, including the Prisoner's Dilemma.
Explains how behavioral economics modifies traditional game theory by incorporating psychological factors and experimental findings.
A visual and accessible explanation of the Prisoner's Dilemma and its implications.
Lecture notes from an MIT Game Theory course, covering core concepts and mathematical formulations.
A chapter discussing the methodology and findings of experimental game theory, focusing on how real behavior deviates from theoretical predictions.
An article discussing the intersection of game theory and experimental economics, highlighting key research areas and applications.
While a book, this link leads to reviews and descriptions of a highly accessible introduction to game theory principles for practical decision-making.
A clear explanation of Nash Equilibrium, a fundamental concept in game theory, with examples.
A survey article that provides an overview of behavioral economics, including its use of game theory and experimental methods.