Geometry Optimization and Relaxation in DFT

In Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, finding the lowest energy structure of a material or molecule is crucial. Geometry optimization, also known as structural relaxation, is the process of systematically adjusting the atomic positions and/or lattice parameters of a system to find its equilibrium configuration, which corresponds to a local minimum on the potential energy surface.

Why Optimize Geometry?

Real materials and molecules are not static. Their atoms vibrate around equilibrium positions. DFT calculations aim to model these systems at their most stable state. An optimized geometry provides the most accurate representation of the material's properties, such as its electronic band structure, vibrational frequencies, and mechanical stability. Without optimization, calculated properties would be based on an arbitrary or unstable starting configuration.

What is the primary goal of geometry optimization in DFT?

To find the equilibrium atomic positions and/or lattice parameters that correspond to a local minimum on the potential energy surface, representing the most stable configuration of the system.

The Process of Relaxation

Geometry optimization is an iterative process. It starts with an initial guess for the atomic positions and/or lattice vectors. In each step, the forces acting on the atoms and the stress on the unit cell are calculated. These forces and stresses are then used by an algorithm to propose a new, lower-energy configuration. This process continues until a convergence criterion is met, typically when the forces on all atoms are below a certain threshold and the stress on the unit cell is negligible.

Optimization algorithms use forces and stresses to iteratively move atoms towards lower energy.

Optimization algorithms like the conjugate gradient or quasi-Newton methods use the calculated forces on atoms and stresses on the unit cell to determine the direction and magnitude of the next atomic displacement or lattice deformation. The goal is to descend the energy landscape.

Commonly used algorithms for geometry optimization include:

Steepest Descent: Moves atoms in the direction opposite to the force. Simple but can be slow to converge.
Conjugate Gradient: Improves upon steepest descent by incorporating information from previous steps to avoid redundant searches, leading to faster convergence.
Quasi-Newton Methods (e.g., BFGS): Approximate the Hessian matrix (second derivative of energy with respect to atomic positions) to predict the minimum more efficiently. These are generally the fastest for molecular systems.

For crystalline solids, optimization may also involve adjusting the lattice vectors (cell shape and size) to minimize the stress on the unit cell, in addition to moving atomic positions within the cell.

Convergence Criteria

Convergence is achieved when the system is sufficiently close to a minimum. Typical criteria include:

Maximum Force: The largest force component on any atom is below a specified threshold (e.g., 0.01 eV/Å).
Root-Mean-Square (RMS) Force: The square root of the average of the squared forces on all atoms is below a threshold.
Maximum Displacement: The largest displacement of any atom in an optimization step is below a threshold.
RMS Displacement: Similar to RMS force, but for displacements.
Maximum Stress/RMS Stress: For solid-state calculations, the stress tensor components or their RMS value are also checked against a threshold.

Choosing appropriate convergence criteria is a balance between accuracy and computational cost. Tighter criteria lead to more accurate geometries but require more calculation steps.

Practical Considerations

When performing geometry optimization, several factors are important:

Initial Guess: A reasonable starting structure can significantly speed up convergence. Experimental structures or results from less computationally expensive methods are good starting points.
Constraints: Sometimes, certain degrees of freedom are fixed (e.g., keeping a molecule adsorbed on a surface in a specific orientation). Constraints can be applied to prevent atoms or lattice vectors from changing.
Symmetry: Exploiting symmetry can reduce the number of degrees of freedom and speed up calculations, but care must be taken to ensure the symmetry is appropriate for the relaxed structure.
Local Minima: Optimization algorithms can get trapped in local minima, which are not the absolute lowest energy state. Running optimizations from different starting points or using specialized methods might be necessary to find the global minimum.

Imagine a landscape with hills and valleys. The energy of a material is like the altitude at a given atomic configuration (position). Geometry optimization is like rolling a ball down this landscape. The ball will naturally seek the lowest point (valley). The forces on the atoms are like the slope of the landscape, guiding the ball. Optimization algorithms are the methods used to efficiently find these lowest points. The process stops when the ball is in a flat region (minimum force) and no longer rolling.

📚

Text-based content

Library pages focus on text content

Common DFT Software for Optimization

Many widely used DFT codes include robust geometry optimization routines. Examples include:

VASP (Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package)
Quantum ESPRESSO
CP2K
Gaussian
ABINIT
SIESTA

Learning Resources

VASP Manual: Relaxation(documentation)

Official VASP documentation detailing the parameters and methods for performing geometry relaxation calculations.

Quantum ESPRESSO Tutorial: Geometry Optimization(tutorial)

A practical guide on setting up and running geometry optimization calculations using the Quantum ESPRESSO suite.

Introduction to DFT: Geometry Optimization(blog)

Explains the fundamental concepts behind geometry optimization in computational chemistry, including the role of forces and convergence.

CP2K Tutorial: Geometry Optimization(documentation)

Detailed documentation on how to perform geometry optimizations with the CP2K software package, covering various algorithms and settings.

Gaussian Optimization Tutorial(documentation)

Information on performing geometry optimizations in Gaussian, a widely used quantum chemistry software.

Materials Project: DFT Basics(documentation)

Provides an overview of DFT calculations, including the importance of structural relaxation for predicting material properties.

Computational Materials Science: DFT(tutorial)

A comprehensive tutorial series on computational materials science, with sections covering DFT and structural relaxation.

Understanding DFT Calculations: A Practical Guide(video)

A video explaining the basics of DFT, including the concept of finding the minimum energy structure through optimization.

ABINIT Tutorial: Geometry Optimization(tutorial)

A step-by-step guide to performing geometry optimization calculations using the ABINIT code.

SIESTA Tutorial: Geometry Optimization(tutorial)

A tutorial on setting up and running geometry optimization calculations with the SIESTA code.

Performing Geometry Optimization and Relaxation