Understanding Quality Scores in Genomics and NGS Data
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies generate vast amounts of data, but not all of it is equally reliable. Quality scores are a crucial metric used to assess the accuracy of individual base calls made by sequencing machines. Understanding these scores is fundamental for interpreting NGS data and ensuring the validity of downstream genomic analyses.
What are Quality Scores?
Quality scores, often referred to as Phred scores, are a numerical representation of the probability that a base call made by the sequencer is incorrect. A higher Phred score indicates a lower probability of error, and thus higher confidence in the base call. These scores are typically assigned to each base in a sequencing read.
Interpreting Quality Scores
Interpreting quality scores involves looking at the distribution of scores across reads and over the length of the reads. This helps identify potential issues with the sequencing run or the library preparation.
| Phred Score (Q) | Error Probability (P) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.1 (10%) | Low confidence; likely error |
| 20 | 0.01 (1%) | Moderate confidence; acceptable for some analyses |
| 30 | 0.001 (0.1%) | High confidence; generally considered good quality |
| 40 | 0.0001 (0.01%) | Very high confidence; excellent quality |
Quality Score Distributions
Visualizing quality score distributions is a common practice. A typical plot shows the average quality score per base position across all reads. Ideally, quality scores should remain high throughout the read length. A drop in quality scores towards the end of reads is common due to various sequencing artifacts.
A common visualization for NGS data quality is a 'per-base quality score plot'. This plot typically shows the average Phred score on the y-axis and the base position within a read on the x-axis. Different colored lines might represent different samples or lanes. A healthy plot shows high and relatively stable quality scores across most of the read length, with a potential gradual decline towards the end. Sharp drops or consistently low scores can indicate problems with the sequencing run, library preparation, or instrument performance. For example, a plateau at Q30 or higher for the majority of the read length is desirable.
Text-based content
Library pages focus on text content
Common Quality Issues and Their Impact
Several factors can lead to low-quality scores, including:
- Sequencing chemistry issues: Problems with reagents or flow cell.
- Library preparation artifacts: Inefficient adapter ligation, PCR amplification bias, or contamination.
- Instrument calibration: Drift in instrument performance over time.
- Contamination: Presence of foreign DNA or reagents.
Low-quality bases can lead to incorrect variant calls, misassemblies, and unreliable downstream analyses. Therefore, quality control and filtering are essential steps in any NGS workflow.
A Phred score of 20 is often considered a minimum threshold for reliable base calls in many genomic applications, meaning a 1% error rate. However, for critical applications like variant detection, higher thresholds (e.g., Q30) are often preferred.
Tools for Quality Control
Numerous bioinformatics tools are available to assess and visualize NGS data quality, including FastQC, MultiQC, and QualiMap. These tools generate comprehensive reports that summarize various quality metrics, including base quality scores, adapter content, GC content, and sequence duplication levels.
A Phred score of 30 represents an error probability of 0.001, or 0.1% (1 in 1000 bases are wrong).
Learning Resources
The official documentation for FastQC, a widely used tool for generating quality control reports for raw sequencing data. It provides detailed explanations of the metrics it assesses, including base quality scores.
Learn how to use MultiQC to consolidate and summarize results from multiple FastQC reports and other bioinformatics tools, providing an aggregated view of sequencing quality across many samples.
An official Illumina document explaining the fundamentals of their quality score system, its meaning, and how it's used to assess sequencing data accuracy.
A concise explanation of Phred quality scores, their mathematical basis, and their importance in interpreting sequencing data. Useful for grasping the core concept.
A video tutorial that walks through the practical aspects of NGS quality control, including interpreting quality score plots and common issues. (Note: Specific video content may vary, but this type of resource is valuable).
A lecture from a Coursera course that provides an overview of NGS data, including the importance of quality scores as a foundational concept in data analysis. (Note: Access may require Coursera account).
The Wikipedia entry for Phred quality scores, offering a comprehensive overview of their definition, history, and application in bioinformatics.
The official website for QualiMap, another powerful tool for assessing and visualizing NGS data quality, with a focus on detailed statistical analysis and graphical reports.
A scientific paper discussing best practices in NGS data analysis, often covering the critical role of quality control and interpretation of quality scores. (Note: May be behind a paywall or require institutional access).
A tutorial from the Galaxy Project that guides users through performing NGS quality control using various tools, often including explanations of quality score interpretation within a user-friendly platform.