Sub-topic 2: Drafting for Different Jurisdictions: Choice of Law and Forum Selection
When drafting contracts that involve parties or performance in multiple jurisdictions, it's crucial to address potential conflicts of law and where disputes will be resolved. This section explores the critical elements of 'Choice of Law' and 'Forum Selection' clauses.
Understanding Choice of Law
The 'Choice of Law' clause (also known as a 'Governing Law' clause) specifies which jurisdiction's laws will be used to interpret and enforce the contract. This is vital because different jurisdictions have different legal rules, interpretations, and public policies that can significantly impact the contract's validity and enforceability.
Understanding Forum Selection
The 'Forum Selection' clause (also known as a 'Jurisdiction' or 'Venue' clause) designates the specific court or arbitration tribunal where any disputes arising from the contract must be litigated or arbitrated. This clause aims to prevent parties from suing in inconvenient or unfavorable locations.
Interplay Between Choice of Law and Forum Selection
While often included together, Choice of Law and Forum Selection are distinct. A contract might specify that New York law governs, but disputes must be heard in California courts. It's crucial to draft these clauses carefully to ensure they align with the parties' overall risk allocation strategy and desired dispute resolution process.
| Feature | Choice of Law | Forum Selection |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Determines which jurisdiction's substantive laws apply. | Determines the physical location and type of tribunal for dispute resolution. |
| Impact | Affects contract interpretation, validity, and remedies. | Affects convenience, cost, and procedural rules of dispute resolution. |
| Example Clause | "This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware." | "Any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be exclusively litigated in the state or federal courts located in the City of London, England." |
Drafting Considerations and Best Practices
When drafting these clauses, consider the following:
- Clarity and Specificity: Avoid ambiguity. Clearly state the jurisdiction and, if applicable, the specific court or arbitration body.
- Reasonableness: Ensure the chosen law and forum are not unduly burdensome or unfair to either party.
- Public Policy: Be aware of public policy exceptions that might render a clause unenforceable.
- Enforceability: Research the enforceability of such clauses in the relevant jurisdictions.
- International Contracts: For cross-border agreements, consider the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Think of Choice of Law as choosing the 'rulebook' for your contract dispute, and Forum Selection as choosing the 'stadium' where the game will be played.
To specify which jurisdiction's laws will be used to interpret and enforce the contract.
The specific court or arbitration tribunal where disputes arising from the contract must be resolved.
The relationship between Choice of Law and Forum Selection can be visualized as two distinct but related decision points in contract drafting. First, parties decide on the governing legal principles (Choice of Law). Second, they decide on the venue for resolving disputes (Forum Selection). These decisions are often made in tandem to ensure a predictable and manageable dispute resolution process.
Text-based content
Library pages focus on text content
Learning Resources
This article provides a practical overview of drafting and enforcing choice of law and forum selection clauses, highlighting key considerations for commercial contracts.
Explores the nuances of these clauses, including common pitfalls and best practices for ensuring their enforceability in various jurisdictions.
The official text and explanatory report of the Hague Convention, which aims to enhance the effectiveness of exclusive choice of court agreements in international commercial litigation.
The foundational treaty for international arbitration, outlining the framework for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards.
A PDF document from PwC discussing the importance and implications of these clauses in international commercial agreements.
An article from the American Bar Association's Business Law Today, offering insights for legal professionals on these critical contract provisions.
Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute provides a concise explanation of jurisdiction and choice of law principles in the U.S. legal system.
A guide from the International Bar Association (IBA) offering practical advice on drafting these clauses for international transactions.
Discusses the legal standards and factors courts consider when determining the enforceability of forum selection clauses.
A video tutorial explaining the fundamental concepts of choice of law and jurisdiction in international contract drafting, suitable for beginners.