Sub-topic 5: The Argument Section of a Legal Brief

The argument section is the heart of a legal brief. It's where you present your case, persuade the court, and demonstrate why your client should prevail. This section requires a strategic blend of legal reasoning, factual analysis, and persuasive language.

Structure of the Argument

A well-structured argument section typically follows a logical progression. While variations exist, a common and effective approach is to organize arguments by issue or point of law. Each argument should ideally include the following components:

The IRAC Method (and its variations)

A foundational framework for legal analysis, IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) is often adapted for structuring arguments within a brief. While the brief's overall structure might differ, the internal logic of each argument often mirrors IRAC.

Crafting Persuasive Arguments

Beyond structure, the art of persuasion is paramount. This involves not only presenting sound legal logic but also framing your arguments effectively.

Think of your argument section as a carefully constructed bridge. Each piece of evidence and legal precedent is a support, leading the reader (the judge) logically and compellingly to your desired conclusion.

Key Elements of Persuasive Argumentation

To maximize persuasiveness, consider these elements:

Clarity and Conciseness: Avoid jargon where possible and use clear, direct language. Every sentence should serve a purpose.
Strong Topic Sentences: Each paragraph or sub-section should begin with a clear statement of the point it will prove.
Effective Use of Authority: Cite relevant statutes and case law accurately and explain their significance to your case. Distinguish unfavorable precedent.
Factual Storytelling: Weave the facts of your case into your legal analysis. Show, don't just tell, how the facts support your legal position.
Addressing Counterarguments: Anticipate and address potential counterarguments from the opposing side. This demonstrates thoroughness and strengthens your own position.
Tone: Maintain a professional, respectful, and confident tone. Avoid overly emotional or aggressive language.

What are the four core components of the IRAC method?

Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion.

Organizing Multiple Arguments

When a brief addresses multiple legal issues, the order in which these arguments are presented can be strategic. Generally, you should present your strongest arguments first. Consider the following:

Order of Importance: Present the arguments that are most critical to winning your case first.
Logical Flow: Ensure that arguments build upon each other or follow a natural progression.
Court's Priorities: Sometimes, certain issues are more likely to be of interest to the court.

Visualizing the structure of a legal argument helps in understanding its flow. Imagine a funnel: starting broad with the issue, narrowing down to specific rules, applying those rules to the unique facts of the case, and finally arriving at a precise conclusion. This visual metaphor emphasizes the process of distillation and focused analysis required in legal argumentation.

📚

Text-based content

Library pages focus on text content

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even experienced legal writers can fall into common traps when drafting their arguments. Being aware of these can help you avoid them:

Lack of Specificity: Vague assertions without supporting facts or law.
Over-reliance on Authority: Simply quoting cases without explaining their relevance.
Ignoring Opposing Arguments: Failing to acknowledge or address the other side's points.
Repetitiveness: Saying the same thing multiple times without adding new insight.
Poor Organization: Jumping between points or presenting arguments illogically.
Grammar and Typos: Errors detract from credibility.

Why is it important to address counterarguments in your brief?

It demonstrates thoroughness, strengthens your own position by preempting objections, and shows respect for the court's need to consider all sides.

Learning Resources

The Argument Section of a Brief(blog)

This resource from the American Bar Association provides practical tips and strategies for crafting effective argument sections in legal briefs.

How to Write a Legal Brief: Argument Section(documentation)

A detailed guide from Stanford Law School on structuring and writing the argument section of a legal brief, including advice on persuasive writing.

Legal Writing: The Argument(documentation)

This document from Georgetown Law focuses on the core principles of constructing a compelling legal argument, emphasizing clarity and logic.

Writing Persuasive Legal Arguments(documentation)

A guide from the University of Pennsylvania Law School that delves into the techniques for making legal arguments more persuasive and impactful.

The Art of Legal Argumentation(paper)

While a Supreme Court opinion, this document indirectly showcases effective argumentation and can be studied for its persuasive structure and legal reasoning.

Legal Writing: Structure of the Argument(documentation)

Harvard Law School's approach to organizing the argument section, focusing on logical flow and the effective presentation of legal points.

IRAC Method Explained(wikipedia)

Cornell's Legal Information Institute provides a clear explanation of the IRAC method, a fundamental tool for legal analysis and argumentation.

Crafting Effective Legal Arguments(paper)

An article from the ABA Litigation Journal offering insights into the strategic and rhetorical aspects of building strong legal arguments.

Legal Writing: The Argument Section(documentation)

Northwestern Pritzker School of Law's guide to the argument section, covering essential elements and common mistakes to avoid.

Persuasive Legal Writing: The Argument(documentation)

This resource from the Legal Writing Institute focuses on the persuasive elements of legal writing, specifically within the argument section of a brief.